<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presidential Nominees Almost Set</title>
	<link>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2008/02/08/presidential-nominees-almost-set/</link>
	<description>observations on healthcare, technology and the American way by Brian Sharp</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: inorgas</title>
		<link>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2008/02/08/presidential-nominees-almost-set/#comment-288</link>
		<author>inorgas</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2008/02/08/presidential-nominees-almost-set/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>"Hillary or Obama.  At this point it simply means the country is going to move left during the next 4 years.  Although McCain is a Republican, he is not a Reagan conservative.  Thus, with Hillary fully believing in socialism and Obama even more to the left of Hillary, we are almost guaranteed to move to a more liberal agenda."
You can out more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hillary or Obama.  At this point it simply means the country is going to move left during the next 4 years.  Although McCain is a Republican, he is not a Reagan conservative.  Thus, with Hillary fully believing in socialism and Obama even more to the left of Hillary, we are almost guaranteed to move to a more liberal agenda.&#8221;<br />
You can out more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dierbuger</title>
		<link>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2008/02/08/presidential-nominees-almost-set/#comment-111</link>
		<author>dierbuger</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2008/02/08/presidential-nominees-almost-set/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Oh man! Are you all still here? I thought this is not an interesting topic anymore! Visit other sources!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man! Are you all still here? I thought this is not an interesting topic anymore! Visit other sources!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorrence</title>
		<link>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2008/02/08/presidential-nominees-almost-set/#comment-67</link>
		<author>Dorrence</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2008/02/08/presidential-nominees-almost-set/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>On the Democratic side, it appears that the "ground swell" of support is going for Obama.  Since this posting, he has won three more primaries and has now taken the lead in electoral counts.

If the choice is between Hillary and Obama, the call will be a tough one.  Both advocate modified forms of socialized medicine.  Both have the tendency to fall towards single payer systems operated by the government.  However, Hillary has a track record from 1993 when she proposed radical and exhorbitant changes in the healthcare system in the USA.  Her plans from 1993 she now admits are not "necessary", but the whole matter begs the question that, if these changes proposed in 1993 were not necessary, are her plans today so?  Has she in the last decade suddenly taken a greater interest in the operations of the industry?  Has she suddenly learned more about the operations of insurers, underwriters, PPO networks?  I fear the answer to all of these is "NO", and so we are faced with still an uninformed politician seeking to solve something they don't understand.

Obama may not be any better in the end, but if the choice is between the two I personally think Obama is the safer choice from what the democrats have to offer this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Democratic side, it appears that the &#8220;ground swell&#8221; of support is going for Obama.  Since this posting, he has won three more primaries and has now taken the lead in electoral counts.</p>
<p>If the choice is between Hillary and Obama, the call will be a tough one.  Both advocate modified forms of socialized medicine.  Both have the tendency to fall towards single payer systems operated by the government.  However, Hillary has a track record from 1993 when she proposed radical and exhorbitant changes in the healthcare system in the USA.  Her plans from 1993 she now admits are not &#8220;necessary&#8221;, but the whole matter begs the question that, if these changes proposed in 1993 were not necessary, are her plans today so?  Has she in the last decade suddenly taken a greater interest in the operations of the industry?  Has she suddenly learned more about the operations of insurers, underwriters, PPO networks?  I fear the answer to all of these is &#8220;NO&#8221;, and so we are faced with still an uninformed politician seeking to solve something they don&#8217;t understand.</p>
<p>Obama may not be any better in the end, but if the choice is between the two I personally think Obama is the safer choice from what the democrats have to offer this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

