<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why All The Workers&#8217; Compensation PPO Consolidation in 2007?</title>
	<link>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2007/10/13/why-all-the-workers-compensation-ppo-consolidation-in-2007/</link>
	<description>observations on healthcare, technology and the American way by Brian Sharp</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 04:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2007/10/13/why-all-the-workers-compensation-ppo-consolidation-in-2007/#comment-7</link>
		<author>bryan</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2007/10/13/why-all-the-workers-compensation-ppo-consolidation-in-2007/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Frankly, what will happen if the rates for access to PPO networks do go up with the "800 Pound Gorilla Networks"? Let them drive up costs.  This will likely produce less than stellar service to their clients and as they will be busy merging and evaluating the host of other networks they've aquired for quite some time to come which may create some negatives between a network and the providers in it - this is no small task. Let's add along with this merging staffs and  determining future direction while working to keep and consolidate their position with their clients- also very challenging.

We all know that as a Payor, savings is the bottom line. Yes, that's true but we are really saving less if the cost of the savings keeps going up.  You have control, not them. I'm finding that there are several other PPO choices in our marketplace. I think that those folks that think there are no other choices simply are misinformed or are not willing to look at these other networks at any depth.  We all should do a little more homework. I think we'll find some PPO networks of value out there when we do.
 
I know of specific cases where when other networks are evaluated that the results have been surprisingly good - and not in the favor of the "800 Pound Gorilla".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, what will happen if the rates for access to PPO networks do go up with the &#8220;800 Pound Gorilla Networks&#8221;? Let them drive up costs.  This will likely produce less than stellar service to their clients and as they will be busy merging and evaluating the host of other networks they&#8217;ve aquired for quite some time to come which may create some negatives between a network and the providers in it - this is no small task. Let&#8217;s add along with this merging staffs and  determining future direction while working to keep and consolidate their position with their clients- also very challenging.</p>
<p>We all know that as a Payor, savings is the bottom line. Yes, that&#8217;s true but we are really saving less if the cost of the savings keeps going up.  You have control, not them. I&#8217;m finding that there are several other PPO choices in our marketplace. I think that those folks that think there are no other choices simply are misinformed or are not willing to look at these other networks at any depth.  We all should do a little more homework. I think we&#8217;ll find some PPO networks of value out there when we do.</p>
<p>I know of specific cases where when other networks are evaluated that the results have been surprisingly good - and not in the favor of the &#8220;800 Pound Gorilla&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorrence</title>
		<link>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2007/10/13/why-all-the-workers-compensation-ppo-consolidation-in-2007/#comment-4</link>
		<author>Dorrence</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthcarethoughts.com/2007/10/13/why-all-the-workers-compensation-ppo-consolidation-in-2007/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Another factor in consideration of PPO’s, especially in the Workers’ Compensation arena, is in looking realistically at the depth of penetration and savings that is possible.  Unfortunately, too many clients that would have need of accessing a PPO network fail to truly incorporate the direction of care component.  Without putting in place adequate tools for Adjustors, Utilization Management Nurses and Case Managers to see and refer in-network, then much of the savings potential of any PPO Network is lost.

Technology has come so far that any client looking at accessing a PPO Network for savings (whether that be a Third Party Administrator, Self-Insured Employer, or Insurance Carrier) should work to establish policies with their referral staff, along with working with the PPO I.T. staff to establish real-time data access to make sure referrals occur in network wherever possible.  Referral staff should be incentivized to see that in-network referrals occur, and out-of-network referrals are minimized.

Finally, technology can only do so much.  Clients should work with their referral staff members to help them recognize that the best possible savings often come through “specialty networks”.  These organizations have negotiated deep savings as well as providing a customer service component for scheduling appointments and referrals.  Generally, these are tracked via their 800# call center’s.   Many times the deep savings potential is missed because referral staff members see these 800# centers are cumbersome when in fact, they are far from that.  Many have online scheduling capabilities which allow appointments to be made (or rescheduled) immediately.  Those that allow these networks to be utilized find them easily accessible, cooperative, and resulting in the savings desired.

There are many PPO choices in the market today.  I would suggest that only those networks that can afford the technological answers along with innovative specialty network solutions, and the appropriate network coverage should be looked at seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another factor in consideration of PPO’s, especially in the Workers’ Compensation arena, is in looking realistically at the depth of penetration and savings that is possible.  Unfortunately, too many clients that would have need of accessing a PPO network fail to truly incorporate the direction of care component.  Without putting in place adequate tools for Adjustors, Utilization Management Nurses and Case Managers to see and refer in-network, then much of the savings potential of any PPO Network is lost.</p>
<p>Technology has come so far that any client looking at accessing a PPO Network for savings (whether that be a Third Party Administrator, Self-Insured Employer, or Insurance Carrier) should work to establish policies with their referral staff, along with working with the PPO I.T. staff to establish real-time data access to make sure referrals occur in network wherever possible.  Referral staff should be incentivized to see that in-network referrals occur, and out-of-network referrals are minimized.</p>
<p>Finally, technology can only do so much.  Clients should work with their referral staff members to help them recognize that the best possible savings often come through “specialty networks”.  These organizations have negotiated deep savings as well as providing a customer service component for scheduling appointments and referrals.  Generally, these are tracked via their 800# call center’s.   Many times the deep savings potential is missed because referral staff members see these 800# centers are cumbersome when in fact, they are far from that.  Many have online scheduling capabilities which allow appointments to be made (or rescheduled) immediately.  Those that allow these networks to be utilized find them easily accessible, cooperative, and resulting in the savings desired.</p>
<p>There are many PPO choices in the market today.  I would suggest that only those networks that can afford the technological answers along with innovative specialty network solutions, and the appropriate network coverage should be looked at seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
